falsafe molasadra
bagar Hossinlo
Abstract
Since, in accordance with the principles ofanalogical unity of existence doctrine, existence is a real original thing and is gradation in this real original existence; there are levels of existences that are original and real, their existence, in all. According to this, the fundamental question is that ...
Read More
Since, in accordance with the principles ofanalogical unity of existence doctrine, existence is a real original thing and is gradation in this real original existence; there are levels of existences that are original and real, their existence, in all. According to this, the fundamental question is that what is the Inadequacy of this theory? Can this Inadequacy be resolved on the basis of the principles of analogical unity of existence doctrine? Since this philosophical system, is faced with challenging Inadequacy because is weak in explanation of gradation of species, horizontal gradation, absoluteness of God, description of all levels of existence to adjectives of perfection and existential. Of course the Inadequacy of analogical unity of existence doctrine, with its interpretation and explanation, can be resolved by personal unity of existence doctrine. So, with puting aside this theory, (as Mulla Sadra did) and replacing personal unity of existence doctrine, its philosophical explanation, a reconstruction of philosophical concepts in this theory, and the design of the new philosophical system; this Inadequacy can be resolved. Probably, the reason is that Mulla Sadra, at the end of the second volume of Asfar and in book of Igaz an-naimin (Awakening the sleepers), with puting aside doctrine of analogical unity of existence, he paid in doctrine of personal unity of existence but he could not complete it. So, this research could be a small step towards the beginning of completing that.
falsafe molasadra
bagar Hossinlo; Hamad Naji asfahani
Volume 6, Issue 2 , February 2018, , Pages 63-85
Abstract
Mulla Sadra’s philosophical ideas – as one of the pioneers in the field of ontology – have had many ups and downs over the time. So as more of his philosophical notions and ideas affected by evolution and have been changed. By passing by and putting aside his former theories and viewpoints, ...
Read More
Mulla Sadra’s philosophical ideas – as one of the pioneers in the field of ontology – have had many ups and downs over the time. So as more of his philosophical notions and ideas affected by evolution and have been changed. By passing by and putting aside his former theories and viewpoints, he has replaced them by new theories by means of which he has interned philosophy into new and modern valleys and arenas(areas). Having been observing Sadra’s though and ideas promenade on one of the most important philosophical problems – i.e.essence and its constructionalmeaning– this essay is trying to express Sadra’s last and latest viewpoint (lookouts) by consideration and inspection of his various comments in this field.The most challenging and very serious problem confronting Sadra in this case are these: finally what is the status of the essence? And is essencerealized in word outside or not? In reply to these questions, he presents the constructionalmeaning of essence and expresses that idea by means of these sentences: “the essence is accidental’, “the essence is the limit of the existence”, “the essence is virtual”, “the essence is dependent”. The matters Sadra wants to express as his final comment in the format of these propositions are these: a) essence has no external realization in anyway and b) having considered it as constructional matter and having endeavored to express it with phrases such as “by accident”, “limit of existence”, virtuality of essence”– are due to the language restrictions. Otherwise, he does not desire to accent that the essence has external realization.
falsafe molasadra
bagar Hossinlo; Hamed Naji
Volume 4, Issue 2 , August 2016, , Pages 31-50
Abstract
The mystic’s unity of existence doctrine has been always considered by the Islamic philosophers. Mulla Sadra in philosophical explanation of mystical unity of existence has considered both doctrine of analogical unity of existence and personal unity of existence. Designing of personal unity ...
Read More
The mystic’s unity of existence doctrine has been always considered by the Islamic philosophers. Mulla Sadra in philosophical explanation of mystical unity of existence has considered both doctrine of analogical unity of existence and personal unity of existence. Designing of personal unity of existence doctrine in three domains of ontology, epistemology and theology has the accessories which change the Philosophical concepts. So that, the designing of this theory transform the philosophy known as ancient philosophy. Thus, although the words and expressions are common in personal unity of existence doctrine and ancient philosophy, but you cannot apply the accessories of personal unity of existence doctrine in ancient philosophy. So, if we accept personal unity of existence doctrine, it will be followed the accessories which we have no choice but to accept it. Accepting accessories of this doctrine entails to a new philosophy. In this paper, through review of the accessories of personal unity of existence doctrine, we show that accepting the accessories of this doctrine is necessary for designing of a new philosophical system.
